You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Malnutrition in elder care: qualitative analysis of ethical perceptions of politicians and civil servants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-11-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna-Greta Mamhidir, Mona Kihlgren, Venke Soerlie |
| Abstract |
Few studies have paid attention to ethical responsibility related to malnutrition in elder care. The aim was to illuminate whether politicians and civil servants reason about malnutrition in elder care in relation to ethical responsibility, and further about possible causes and how to address them. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#616
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,689
of 83,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them