You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc5126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shigehiko Uchino, Rinaldo Bellomo, Hiroshi Morimatsu, Makoto Sugihara, Craig French, Dianne Stephens, Julia Wendon, Patrick Honore, John Mulder, Andrew Turner, the PAC/PiCCO Use and Likelihood of Success Evaluation [PULSE] Study Group |
| Abstract |
The choice of invasive systemic haemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients remains controversial as no multicentre comparative clinical data exist. Accordingly, we sought to study and compare the features and outcomes of patients who receive haemodynamic monitoring with either the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) or pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) technology. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 72% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |