↓ Skip to main content

A non-randomised experimental feasibility study into the immediate effect of three different spinal manipulative protocols on kicking speed performance in soccer players

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A non-randomised experimental feasibility study into the immediate effect of three different spinal manipulative protocols on kicking speed performance in soccer players
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12998-014-0046-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle Colin Deutschmann, Andrew Douglas Jones, Charmaine Maria Korporaal

Abstract

The most utilized soccer kicking method is the instep kicking technique. Decreased motion in spinal joint segments results in adverse biomechanical changes within in the kinematic chain. These changes may be linked to a negative impact on soccer performance. This study tested the immediate effect of lumbar spine and sacroiliac manipulation alone and in combination on the kicking speed of uninjured soccer players.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Sports and Recreations 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 25%