You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
A non-randomised experimental feasibility study into the immediate effect of three different spinal manipulative protocols on kicking speed performance in soccer players
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12998-014-0046-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kyle Colin Deutschmann, Andrew Douglas Jones, Charmaine Maria Korporaal |
Abstract |
The most utilized soccer kicking method is the instep kicking technique. Decreased motion in spinal joint segments results in adverse biomechanical changes within in the kinematic chain. These changes may be linked to a negative impact on soccer performance. This study tested the immediate effect of lumbar spine and sacroiliac manipulation alone and in combination on the kicking speed of uninjured soccer players. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Sweden | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Iceland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
Sports and Recreations | 17 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 25% |