You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A whole-genome shotgun approach for assembling and anchoring the hexaploid bread wheat genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0582-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jarrod A Chapman, Martin Mascher, Aydın Buluç, Kerrie Barry, Evangelos Georganas, Adam Session, Veronika Strnadova, Jerry Jenkins, Sunish Sehgal, Leonid Oliker, Jeremy Schmutz, Katherine A Yelick, Uwe Scholz, Robbie Waugh, Jesse A Poland, Gary J Muehlbauer, Nils Stein, Daniel S Rokhsar |
| Abstract |
Polyploid species have long been thought to be recalcitrant to whole-genome assembly. By combining high-throughput sequencing, recent developments in parallel computing, and genetic mapping, we derive, de novo, a sequence assembly representing 9.1 Gbp of the highly repetitive 16 Gbp genome of hexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum, and assign 7.1 Gb of this assembly to chromosomal locations. The genome representation and accuracy of our assembly is comparable or even exceeds that of a chromosome-by-chromosome shotgun assembly. Our assembly and mapping strategy uses only short read sequencing technology and is applicable to any species where it is possible to construct a mapping population. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Scientists | 15 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 26% |
| Researcher | 72 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 196 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#956,775
of 24,527,525 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#709
of 4,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,389
of 362,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#13
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.