↓ Skip to main content

A whole-genome shotgun approach for assembling and anchoring the hexaploid bread wheat genome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A whole-genome shotgun approach for assembling and anchoring the hexaploid bread wheat genome
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0582-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jarrod A Chapman, Martin Mascher, Aydın Buluç, Kerrie Barry, Evangelos Georganas, Adam Session, Veronika Strnadova, Jerry Jenkins, Sunish Sehgal, Leonid Oliker, Jeremy Schmutz, Katherine A Yelick, Uwe Scholz, Robbie Waugh, Jesse A Poland, Gary J Muehlbauer, Nils Stein, Daniel S Rokhsar

Abstract

Polyploid species have long been thought to be recalcitrant to whole-genome assembly. By combining high-throughput sequencing, recent developments in parallel computing, and genetic mapping, we derive, de novo, a sequence assembly representing 9.1 Gbp of the highly repetitive 16 Gbp genome of hexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum, and assign 7.1 Gb of this assembly to chromosomal locations. The genome representation and accuracy of our assembly is comparable or even exceeds that of a chromosome-by-chromosome shotgun assembly. Our assembly and mapping strategy uses only short read sequencing technology and is applicable to any species where it is possible to construct a mapping population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 294 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 25%
Researcher 72 23%
Student > Master 20 6%
Other 19 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 55 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 12%
Computer Science 9 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,006,769
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#719
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,521
of 361,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.