↓ Skip to main content

Natural environments, ancestral diets, and microbial ecology: is there a modern “paleo-deficit disorder”? Part I

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 455)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural environments, ancestral diets, and microbial ecology: is there a modern “paleo-deficit disorder”? Part I
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40101-015-0041-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan C Logan, Martin A Katzman, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez

Abstract

Famed microbiologist René J. Dubos (1901¿1982) was an early pioneer in the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) construct. In the 1960s, he conducted groundbreaking experimental research concerning the ways in which early-life experience with nutrition, microbiota, stress, and other environmental variables could influence later-life health outcomes. He also wrote extensively on potential health consequences of a progressive loss of contact with natural environments (now referred to as green or blue space), arguing that Paleolithic experiences have created needs, particularly in the mental realm, that might not be met in the context of rapid global urbanization. He posited that humans would certainly adapt to modern urban landscapes and high technology, but there might be a toll to be paid in the form of higher psychological distress (symptoms of anxiety and depression) and diminished quality of life. In particular, there might be an erosion of humanness, exemplified by declines in altruism/empathy. Here in the first of a two-part review, we examine contemporary research related to natural environments and question to what extent Dubos might have been correct in some of his 50-year-old assertions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 271 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Student > Master 40 15%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 16%
Psychology 34 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Other 64 23%
Unknown 63 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#954,675
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#37
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,635
of 367,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.