↓ Skip to main content

A systematic evaluation of high-dimensional, ensemble-based regression for exploring large model spaces in microbiome analyses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic evaluation of high-dimensional, ensemble-based regression for exploring large model spaces in microbiome analyses
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0467-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jyoti Shankar, Sebastian Szpakowski, Norma V Solis, Stephanie Mounaud, Hong Liu, Liliana Losada, William C Nierman, Scott G Filler

Abstract

BackgroundMicrobiome studies incorporate next-generation sequencing to obtain profiles of microbial communities. Data generated from these experiments are high-dimensional with a rich correlation structure but modest sample sizes. A statistical model that utilizes these microbiome profiles to explain a clinical or biological endpoint needs to tackle high-dimensionality resulting from the very large space of variable configurations. Ensemble models are a class of approaches that can address high-dimensionality by aggregating information across large model spaces. Although such models are popular in fields as diverse as economics and genetics, their performance on microbiome data has been largely unexplored.ResultsWe developed a simulation framework that accurately captures the constraints of experimental microbiome data. Using this setup, we systematically evaluated a selection of both frequentist and Bayesian regression modeling ensembles. These are represented by variants of stability selection in conjunction with elastic net and spike-and-slab Bayesian model averaging (BMA), respectively. BMA ensembles that explore a larger space of models relative to stability selection variants performed better and had lower variability across simulations. However, stability selection ensembles were able to match the performance of BMA in scenarios of low sparsity where several variables had large regression coefficients.ConclusionsGiven a microbiome dataset of interest, we present a methodology to generate simulated data that closely mimics its characteristics in a manner that enables meaningful evaluation of analytical strategies. Our evaluation demonstrates that the largest ensembles yield the strongest performance on microbiome data with modest sample sizes and high-dimensional measurements. We also demonstrate the ability of these ensembles to identify microbiome signatures that are associated with opportunistic Candida albicans colonization during antibiotic exposure. As the focus of microbiome research evolves from pilot to translational studies, we anticipate that our strategy will aid investigators in making evaluation-based decisions for selecting appropriate analytical methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Estonia 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 30%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 32%
Computer Science 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Chemistry 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,412,605
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,470
of 7,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,147
of 352,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#44
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.