↓ Skip to main content

Family-based treatment with transition age youth with anorexia nervosa: a qualitative summary of application in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family-based treatment with transition age youth with anorexia nervosa: a qualitative summary of application in clinical practice
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40337-015-0037-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gina Dimitropoulos, Victoria E Freeman, Brooke Allemang, Jennifer Couturier, Gail McVey, James Lock, Daniel Le Grange

Abstract

Family based treatment (FBT) has been empirically investigated in adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 years of age. Although parental control over eating symptoms and the weight gain process are temporary and necessary due to serious medical complications, FBT may be developmentally inappropriate when working with older adolescents. To date, there are no studies identifying how the principles of this model are used differentially across different stages of adolescence. This study aimed to identify how clinicians informed by FBT employ this model with transition age youth (TAY) (16-21) with an eating disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,598,456
of 24,460,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#425
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,740
of 361,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,460,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.