↓ Skip to main content

The research activities of Ontario’s large community acute care hospitals: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The research activities of Ontario’s large community acute care hospitals: a scoping review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2517-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulio DiDiodato, John Alexander DiDiodato, Aidan Samuel McKee

Abstract

Ontario's large community hospitals (LCHs) provide care to 65% of the province's hospitalized patients, yet we know very little about their research activities. By searching for research publications from 2013 to 2015, we will describe the extent, type and collaborative nature of Ontario's LCHs' research activities. We conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed, Embase and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases from January 1, 2013 until December 31, 2015 for all publication types whose author(s) was affiliated with any of the 44 LCHs. Articles were screened and abstracted by three reviewers, independently. The data were charted and results described using summary statistics, scatter plots, and bar charts. We included 798 publications from 39 LCHs and 454 authors. The median number of publications was 7 (Interquartile range (IQR) 23). Observational study design was most commonly reported in over 50% of publications. Program evaluation was the focus in 40% of publications. Primary LCH authorship was observed for 535 publications. Over 25% and 65% of the publications were attributable to 24 authors and 9 LCHs, respectively. There was minimal collaboration both within (21.2%) and between (7.8%) LCHs. LCH size and geographic proximity to academic hospitals had minimal impact on research activity. Ontario's LCHs publish infrequently, collaborate infrequently, and their role in translational research activity is not well defined. A future survey questionnaire to LCH researchers identified through this review is planned to both validate and elicit their interpretations of our study findings and opinions about LCH involvement in research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Researcher 7 15%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 31%