↓ Skip to main content

The interventionalism of medicine: interventional radiology, cardiology, and neuroradiology

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Medicine, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 103)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interventionalism of medicine: interventional radiology, cardiology, and neuroradiology
Published in
International Archives of Medicine, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1755-7682-2-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaheen E Lakhan, Anna Kaplan, Cyndi Laird, Yaacov Leiter

Abstract

Interventional medical practitioners are specialists who do minimally invasive procedures instead of surgery or other treatment. Most often, these procedures utilize various imaging and catheterization techniques in order to diagnose and treat vascular issues in the body. Interventionalist techniques, including injecting arteries with dye, visualizing these via x-ray, and opening up blockages, developed from early pioneers' bold and sometimes controversial experiments which aimed to find safer and better ways to treat coronary artery and other atherosclerotic vascular disease. Currently, the major interventional specialties are interventional (or vascular) radiology, interventional cardiology, and endovascular surgical (interventional) neuroradiology. All three are perfecting the use of stents and other procedures to keep diseased arteries open, while also evaluating the application these procedures. The rapid new development of imaging technologies, mechanical devices, and types of treatment, while certainly beneficial to the patient, can also lead to ambiguity regarding specific specialty claims on certain techniques and devices. While these practitioners can be in competition with each other, cooperation and communication are the most advantageous methods to deal with these "turf wars." All of the interventionalists are needed to deliver the best medical care to patients, now and in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Greece 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Engineering 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#37
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,763
of 103,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.