You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-9-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felix Zeifang, Marcus Schiltenwolf, Rainer Abel, Babak Moradi |
| Abstract |
Parameters of MR imaging play a pivotal role in diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and serve as an important tool in clinical decision-making. Despite the importance of MR imaging, little is known about the correlation between MRI parameters, objective gait analysis, and clinical presentation of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 44% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,254,575
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,618
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,204
of 82,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.