↓ Skip to main content

Species delimitation in lemurs: multiple genetic loci reveal low levels of species diversity in the genus Cheirogaleus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
21 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species delimitation in lemurs: multiple genetic loci reveal low levels of species diversity in the genus Cheirogaleus
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linn F Groeneveld, David W Weisrock, Rodin M Rasoloarison, Anne D Yoder, Peter M Kappeler

Abstract

Species are viewed as the fundamental unit in most subdisciplines of biology. To conservationists this unit represents the currency for global biodiversity assessments. Even though Madagascar belongs to one of the top eight biodiversity hotspots of the world, the taxonomy of its charismatic lemuriform primates is not stable. Within the last 25 years, the number of described lemur species has more than doubled, with many newly described species identified among the nocturnal and small-bodied cheirogaleids. Here, we characterize the diversity of the dwarf lemurs (genus Cheirogaleus) and assess the status of the seven described species, based on phylogenetic and population genetic analysis of mtDNA (cytb + cox2) and three nuclear markers (adora3, fiba and vWF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 10%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 79 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 68%
Environmental Science 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Decision Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 4 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,633
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,847
of 185,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.