↓ Skip to main content

The transferome of metabolic genes explored: analysis of the horizontal transfer of enzyme encoding genes in unicellular eukaryotes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The transferome of metabolic genes explored: analysis of the horizontal transfer of enzyme encoding genes in unicellular eukaryotes
Published in
Genome Biology, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r36
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Whitaker, Glenn A McConkey, David R Westhead

Abstract

Metabolic networks are responsible for many essential cellular processes, and exhibit a high level of evolutionary conservation from bacteria to eukaryotes. If genes encoding metabolic enzymes are horizontally transferred and are advantageous, they are likely to become fixed. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has played a key role in prokaryotic evolution and its importance in eukaryotes is increasingly evident. High levels of endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT) accompanied the establishment of plastids and mitochondria, and more recent events have allowed further acquisition of bacterial genes. Here, we present the first comprehensive multi-species analysis of E/HGT of genes encoding metabolic enzymes from bacteria to unicellular eukaryotes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 4%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 2%
United States 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 100 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Computer Science 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 9 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,306
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,954
of 107,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.