↓ Skip to main content

‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
Published in
Trials, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Daykin, Clare Clement, Carrol Gamble, Anna Kearney, Jane Blazeby, Mike Clarke, J. Athene Lane, Alison Shaw

Abstract

Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies used by trial teams and factors which may influence strategy adoption. A purposive sample of active trials was selected from the UK NIHR HTA portfolio of ongoing trials in 2014/2015. Semi-structured interviews with several trial team members from each trial and supplementary interviews with experienced trial managers explored strategies in collecting clinical outcome data and retaining participants. Interview data were analysed thematically using techniques of constant comparison. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews with trial team members including chief investigators, trial managers, nurses and research administrators revealed strategies used to enhance retention. Some were recognised methods and planned from trial outset whilst others were implemented more responsively. Interviewees placed great value on fostering positive relationships with trial participants to enhance retention. However, these strategies took time which was not always appreciated by the wider trial team or funding bodies. The national focus on recruitment targets in networks posed a challenge to staff and was deemed detrimental to retention. The 'moral compass' of individual researchers relied on their own beliefs and values and research experience and the factors affected their confidence to pursue participant data during follow-up. The role of trial staff and their underlying behaviours influence retention practices and, combined with emphasis on recruitment targets, can be detrimental to motivation and retention activities. There is a need to consider how to train and support trial staff involved in retention practices and recognition of retention from funding bodies and oversight organisations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 8%
Computer Science 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 41 39%