↓ Skip to main content

Inferring synteny between genome assemblies: a systematic evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring synteny between genome assemblies: a systematic evaluation
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2026-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dang Liu, Martin Hunt, Isheng J Tsai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 350 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 19%
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Bachelor 53 15%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 69 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 112 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 32%
Computer Science 12 3%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 1%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 83 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,365,777
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#153
of 7,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,509
of 451,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#4
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.