You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detecting frail, older adults and identifying their strengths: results of a mixed-methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-5088-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Dury, Eva Dierckx, Anne van der Vorst, Michaël Van der Elst, Bram Fret, Daan Duppen, Lieve Hoeyberghs, Ellen De Roeck, Deborah Lambotte, An-Sofie Smetcoren, Jos Schols, Gertrudis Kempen, G.A. Rixt Zijlstra, Jan De Lepeleire, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Dominique Verté, Nico De Witte, Tinie Kardol, Peter Paul De Deyn, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Liesbeth De Donder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 30% |
| Belgium | 6 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Morocco | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 14% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,683,290
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,939
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,548
of 454,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#48
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.