↓ Skip to main content

Expression and distribution of Toll-like receptors 11–13 in the brain during murine neurocysticercosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression and distribution of Toll-like receptors 11–13 in the brain during murine neurocysticercosis
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-5-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bibhuti B Mishra, Uma Mahesh Gundra, Judy M Teale

Abstract

The functions of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 11-13 in central nervous system (CNS) infections are currently unknown. Using a murine model of neurocysticercosis, we investigated the expression and distribution of TLRs 11-13 by using both gene specific real-time PCR analysis and in situ immunofluorescence microscopy in both control and neurocysticercosis brains. In the mock infected brain, mRNAs of TLRs 11-13 were constitutively expressed. Parasite infection caused an increase of both mRNAs and protein levels of all three TLRs by several fold. All three TLR proteins were present in both CNS and immune cell types. Among them TLR13 was expressed the most in terms of number of positive cells and brain areas expressing it, followed by TLR11 and TLR12 respectively. Among the nervous tissue cells, TLRs 11-13 protein levels appeared highest in neurons. However, TLR13 expression was also present in ependymal cells, endothelial cells of pial blood vessels, and astrocytes. In contrast, infiltrating CD11b and CD11c positive myeloid cells predominantly produced TLR11 protein, particularly early during infection at 1 wk post infection (approximately 50% cells). TLRs 12 and 13 proteins were present on approximately 5% of infiltrating immune cells. The infiltrating cells positive for TLRs 11-13 were mostly of myeloid origin, CD11b+ cells. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the expression of TLRs 11-13 in normal and parasite infected mouse brains and suggests a role for them in CNS infections.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
China 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 3 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,212
of 2,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,550
of 165,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.