You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The growth and evolution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a 20-year history of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) annual scientific sessions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0429-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel C. Lee, Michael Markl, Erica Dall’Armellina, Yuchi Han, Sebastian Kozerke, Titus Kuehne, Sonia Nielles-Vallespin, Daniel Messroghli, Amit Patel, Tobias Schaeffter, Orlando Simonetti, Anne Marie Valente, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Graham Wright, Stefan Zimmerman, Jeanette Schulz-Menger |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this work is to summarize cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) research trends and highlights presented at the annual Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) scientific sessions over the past 20 years. Scientific programs from all SCMR Annual Scientific Sessions from 1998 to 2017 were obtained. SCMR Headquarters also provided data for the number and the country of origin of attendees and the number of accepted abstracts according to type. Data analysis included text analysis (key word extraction) and visualization by 'word clouds' representing the most frequently used words in session titles for 5-year intervals. In addition, session titles were sorted into 17 major subject categories to further evaluate research and clinical CMR trends over time. Analysis of SCMR annual scientific sessions locations, attendance, and number of accepted abstracts demonstrated substantial growth of CMR research and clinical applications. As an international field of study, significant growth of CMR was documented by a strong increase in SCMR scientific session attendance (> 500%, 270 to 1406 from 1998 to 2017, number of accepted abstracts (> 700%, 98 to 701 from 1998 to 2018) and number of international participants (42-415% increase for participants from Asia, Central and South America, Middle East and Africa in 2004-2017). 'Word clouds' based evaluation of research trends illustrated a shift from early focus on 'MRI technique feasibility' to new established techniques (e.g. late gadolinium enhancement) and their clinical applications and translation (key words 'patient', 'disease') and more recently novel techniques and quantitative CMR imaging (key words 'mapping', 'T1', 'flow', 'function'). Nearly every topic category demonstrated an increase in the number of sessions over the 20-year period with 'Clinical Practice' leading all categories. Our analysis identified three growth areas 'Congenital', 'Clinical Practice', and 'Structure/function/flow'. The analysis of the SCMR historical archives demonstrates a healthy and internationally active field of study which continues to undergo substantial growth and expansion into new and emerging CMR topics and clinical application areas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 47% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 28% |
| Engineering | 9 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,541,922
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#44
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,422
of 451,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.