↓ Skip to main content

Residential particulate matter and distance to roadways in relation to mammographic density: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Residential particulate matter and distance to roadways in relation to mammographic density: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13058-017-0915-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie C. DuPre, Jaime E. Hart, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Peter Kraft, Francine Laden, Rulla M. Tamimi

Abstract

High mammographic density is a strong, well-established breast cancer risk factor. Three studies conducted in various smaller geographic settings reported inconsistent findings between air pollution and mammographic density. We assessed whether particulate matter (PM) exposures (PM2.5, PM2.5-10, and PM10) and distance to roadways were associated with mammographic density among women residing across the United States. The Nurses' Health Studies are prospective cohorts for whom a subset has screening mammograms from the 1990s (interquartile range 1990-1999). PM was estimated using spatio-temporal models linked to residential addresses. Among 3258 women (average age at mammogram 52.7 years), we performed multivariable linear regression to assess associations between square-root-transformed mammographic density and PM within 1 and 3 years before the mammogram. For linear regression estimates of PM in relation to untransformed mammographic density outcomes, bootstrapped robust standard errors are used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses were stratified by menopausal status and region of residence. Recent PM and distance to roadways were not associated with mammographic density in premenopausal women (PM2.5 within 3 years before mammogram β = 0.05, 95% CI -0.16, 0.27; PM2.5-10 β = 0, 95%, CI -0.15, 0.16; PM10 β = 0.02, 95% CI -0.10, 0.13) and postmenopausal women (PM2.5 within 3 years before mammogram β = -0.05, 95% CI -0.27, 0.17; PM2.5-10 β = -0.01, 95% CI -0.16, 0.14; PM10 β = -0.02, 95% CI -0.13, 0.09). Largely null associations were observed within regions. Suggestive associations were observed among postmenopausal women in the Northeast (n = 745), where a 10-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 within 3 years before the mammogram was associated with 3.4 percentage points higher percent mammographic density (95% CI -0.5, 7.3). These findings do not support that recent PM or roadway exposures influence mammographic density. Although PM was largely not associated with mammographic density, we cannot rule out the role of PM during earlier exposure time windows and possible associations among northeastern postmenopausal women.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 42%