↓ Skip to main content

Grid-based prediction of torsion angle probabilities of protein backbone and its application to discrimination of protein intrinsic disorder regions and selection of model structures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Grid-based prediction of torsion angle probabilities of protein backbone and its application to discrimination of protein intrinsic disorder regions and selection of model structures
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2031-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianzhao Gao, Yuedong Yang, Yaoqi Zhou

Abstract

Protein structure can be described by backbone torsion angles: rotational angles about the N-Cα bond (φ) and the Cα-C bond (ψ) or the angle between Cαi-1-Cαi-Cαi + 1 (θ) and the rotational angle about the Cαi-Cαi + 1 bond (τ). Thus, their accurate prediction is useful for structure prediction and model refinement. Early methods predicted torsion angles in a few discrete bins whereas most recent methods have focused on prediction of angles in real, continuous values. Real value prediction, however, is unable to provide the information on probabilities of predicted angles. Here, we propose to predict angles in fine grids of 5° by using deep learning neural networks. We found that this grid-based technique can yield 2-6% higher accuracy in predicting angles in the same 5° bin than existing prediction techniques compared. We further demonstrate the usefulness of predicted probabilities at given angle bins in discrimination of intrinsically disorder regions and in selection of protein models. The proposed method may be useful for characterizing protein structure and disorder. The method is available at http://sparks-lab.org/server/SPIDER2/ as a part of SPIDER2 package.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Computer Science 3 14%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,927,741
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,969
of 7,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,571
of 440,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#90
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.