↓ Skip to main content

Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Safety in Surgery, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13037-014-0056-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter L Biffl, Annalee W Gallagher, Fredric M Pieracci, Crystal Berumen

Abstract

Surgical safety checklists (SSCs) are designed to improve team communication and consistency in care, ultimately avoiding complications. In Colorado, hospitals reported that use of SSCs was standard practice, but a statewide survey indicated that SSC use was inconsistent. The purpose of this project was to directly observe the compliance with the SSC in Colorado hospitals, through direct observation of the perioperative checklist process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient Safety in Surgery
#138
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,036
of 361,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Safety in Surgery
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.