↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evolution of aging in a bacterium

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental evolution of aging in a bacterium
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-7-126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Ackermann, Alexandra Schauerte, Stephen C Stearns, Urs Jenal

Abstract

Aging refers to a decline in reproduction and survival with increasing age. According to evolutionary theory, aging evolves because selection late in life is weak and mutations exist whose deleterious effects manifest only late in life. Whether the assumptions behind this theory are fulfilled in all organisms, and whether all organisms age, has not been clear. We tested the generality of this theory by experimental evolution with Caulobacter crescentus, a bacterium whose asymmetric division allows mother and daughter to be distinguished.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 165 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 25%
Student > Master 24 13%
Professor 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 14 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 18 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#920
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,152
of 76,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.