↓ Skip to main content

Side effects of CT-guided implantation of 125I seeds for recurrent malignant tumors of the head and neck assisted by 3D printing non co-planar template

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Side effects of CT-guided implantation of 125I seeds for recurrent malignant tumors of the head and neck assisted by 3D printing non co-planar template
Published in
Radiation Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13014-018-0959-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuliang Jiang, Zhe Ji, Fuxin Guo, Ran Peng, Haitao Sun, Jinghong Fan, Shuhua Wei, Weiyan Li, Kai Liu, Jinghua Lei, Junjie Wang

Abstract

For the recurrence of head and neck cancer after operation and radiotherapy, the local control of radioactive seed implantation is good, and it has a certain palliative effect. This study aims to investigate the acute and late side effects of a three-dimentional printing non co-planar template (3D-PNCT) for computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive 125I seed (RIS) implantation in recurrent cancer of the head and neck. Between January 2016 and December 2016, forty-two patients with local recurrent malignant tumors of the head and neck received 3D-PNCT-assisted RIS implantation. The prescribed dose was 110-160 Gy. Preoperative planning design, production of individual guide plates, RIS implantation, postoperative dose evaluation, and follow-up were completed for all patients. Side effects in the skin, mucous membranes, blood and spinal cord were evaluated. All patients underwent surgery successfully. Duration of follow-up was 4-14 (median, of 8.5) months. The activity of a single RIS was 0.34-0.7 (median, 0.6) mCi. The number of RIS was 10-126 (median, 34). The number of implantation needles was 4-31 (median, 11). The mean D2cc (dose to the most exposed 2-cc volume) and D0.1cc (dose to the most exposed 0.1-cc volume) of the skin were 24.9 (7.1-85.5) and 47.5 (9.4-167.2), respectively, whereas those of the spinal cord were 8.4 (4.5-33.3) and 14.2 (13.6-63.0), mucosa were 35.1 (4.2-82.8) and 87.0 (6.6-214.1), parotid glands were 16.2 (12.8-19.7) and 29.8 (26.1-33.4) and those of the trachea were 17.9 (2.5-45.9) and 32.7 (3.9-83.9), respectively. No case had an acute reaction of grade ≥ 3. Three cases had a grade-1 skin reaction. Blood toxicity did not occur, nor spinal-cord injury. Xerostomia was not aggravated than that of before brachytherapy. One case had a grade-3 nerve response. 3D-PNCT-assisted RIS implantation can provide good accuracy for positioning. For local recurrent malignant tumor of head and neck, there were no obvious adverse reactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 36%
Engineering 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,929,042
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,290
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,699
of 438,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.