↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a pharmacist-driven intervention in COPD (EPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-driven intervention in COPD (EPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1623-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Davis, Carlo Marra, John-Michael Gamble, Jamie Farrell, Joe Lockyer, J. Mark FitzGerald, Waseem Abu-Ashour, Charlie Gillis, John Hawboldt

Abstract

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often nonadherent with medications and have poor inhaler technique. Community pharmacists can help to improve health-related quality of life and overall outcomes in patients with COPD. We aim to measure the effectiveness of a systematic, pharmacist-driven intervention on patients with diagnosed COPD. This pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial is designed to determine the effectiveness of a multifactorial, pharmacist-led intervention on medication adherence, inhaler technique, health-related quality of life, health care resource utilization including COPD exacerbations, and use of medications. Participating pharmacies in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group. The intervention group will deliver an enhanced form of care that emphasizes COPD management. The control group will provide usual care and a COPD education pamphlet. Included patients will be aged 40 years or older, have a physician-confirmed diagnosis of COPD, and be able to answer questionnaires in English. The primary outcomes are the between-group difference in the change from baseline to 6 months in medication adherence using the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The secondary outcomes are also measured from baseline to 6 months, and include the proportion of patients with a clinically significant change in adherence, the proportion of patients defined as having "good adherence," the mean MPR between groups, quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, medication inhalation technique using a pharmacist-scored checklist, health care resource utilization and antibiotic and orally administered corticosteroid use for COPD exacerbations. Differences between groups will be analyzed at the individual patient level while controlling for clustering effect. A pharmacist-led COPD intervention has the potential to improve patient medication adherence, thus increasing quality of life, possibly decreasing pulmonary exacerbations and reducing utilization of acute health care resources. Methods and results taken from this study could be used to enhance the delivery of COPD care by community pharmacists in a real-world setting. This would serve to enhance COPD population health and quality of life. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) ISRCTN78138190 , registered on 3 February 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 13 5%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 94 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 101 41%