↓ Skip to main content

A genomic timescale for the origin of eukaryotes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A genomic timescale for the origin of eukaryotes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2001
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-1-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Blair Hedges, Hsiong Chen, Sudhir Kumar, Daniel YC Wang, Amanda S Thompson, Hidemi Watanabe

Abstract

Genomic sequence analyses have shown that horizontal gene transfer occurred during the origin of eukaryotes as a consequence of symbiosis. However, details of the timing and number of symbiotic events are unclear. A timescale for the early evolution of eukaryotes would help to better understand the relationship between these biological events and changes in Earth's environment, such as the rise in oxygen. We used refined methods of sequence alignment, site selection, and time estimation to address these questions with protein sequences from complete genomes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Eukaryotes were found to evolve faster than prokaryotes, with those eukaryotes derived from eubacteria evolving faster than those derived from archaebacteria. We found an early time of divergence (approximately 4 billion years ago, Ga) for archaebacteria and the archaebacterial genes in eukaryotes. Our analyses support at least two horizontal gene transfer events in the origin of eukaryotes, at 2.7 Ga and 1.8 Ga. Time estimates for the origin of cyanobacteria (2.6 Ga) and the divergence of an early-branching eukaryote that lacks mitochondria (Giardia) (2.2 Ga) fall between those two events. We find support for two symbiotic events in the origin of eukaryotes: one premitochondrial and a later mitochondrial event. The appearance of cyanobacteria immediately prior to the earliest undisputed evidence for the presence of oxygen (2.4-2.2 Ga) suggests that the innovation of oxygenic photosynthesis had a relatively rapid impact on the environment as it set the stage for further evolution of the eukaryotic cell.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 3 1%
Argentina 3 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 251 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Student > Master 36 13%
Professor 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 66 24%
Unknown 28 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 6%
Environmental Science 14 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 39 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,338,984
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,291
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,233
of 42,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.