↓ Skip to main content

A Paradoxical Role for Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Sepsis and Trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Paradoxical Role for Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Sepsis and Trauma
Published in
Molecular Medicine, November 2010
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2010.00178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex G. Cuenca, Matthew J. Delano, Kindra M. Kelly-Scumpia, Claudia Moreno, Philip O. Scumpia, Drake M. LaFace, Paul G. Heyworth, Philip A. Efron, Lyle L. Moldawer

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogenous population of immature myeloid cells whose numbers dramatically increase in chronic and acute inflammatory diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disease, trauma, burns and sepsis. Studied originally in cancer, these cells are potently immunosuppressive, particularly in their ability to suppress antigen-specific CD8(+) and CD4(+) T-cell activation through multiple mechanisms, including depletion of extracellular arginine, nitrosylation of regulatory proteins, and secretion of interleukin 10, prostaglandins and other immunosuppressive mediators. However, additional properties of these cells, including increased reactive oxygen species and inflammatory cytokine production, as well as their universal expansion in nearly all inflammatory conditions, suggest that MDSCs may be more of a normal component of the inflammatory response ("emergency myelopoiesis") than simply a pathological response to a growing tumor. Recent evocative data even suggest that the expansion of MDSCs in acute inflammatory processes, such as burns and sepsis, plays a beneficial role in the host by increasing immune surveillance and innate immune responses. Although clinical efforts are currently underway to suppress MDSC numbers and function in cancer to improve antineoplastic responses, such approaches may not be desirable or beneficial in other clinical conditions in which immune surveillance and antimicrobial activities are required.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 10%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 41 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,756,086
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#188
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,429
of 101,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.