↓ Skip to main content

Proteomics analysis of faecal proteins in the tick Haemaphysalis flava

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteomics analysis of faecal proteins in the tick Haemaphysalis flava
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13071-018-2673-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Liu, Yi-song Liu, Guo-Hua Liu, Tian-yin Cheng

Abstract

Ticks and tick-borne diseases are of major public health concern. Currently, development of vaccines against ticks is considered crucial for their control. A critical step in this process is the screening of viable antigens. Faeces are byproducts of digestion and blood meal utilization, and partly reflect the vitality and vector potential of ticks. However, an integrated analysis of proteins in tick faeces is lacking. The present study explored the protein components in the faeces of the tick Haemaphysalis flava, by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS) to identify potential protein antigens for vaccine development against ticks. Faeces from adult H. flava engorged females were collected. Proteins were extracted from faeces, and the trypsin-digested peptides were analyzed by LC/MS-MS. High confidence proteins were identified based on unique peptides revealed by MS. Potential faecal protein genes, as well as their sources, were also characterized by searching previous transcriptome datasets from the salivary glands and midgut of H. flava. In total, 21 were recognized with confidence. Amongst these, 18 were of likely tick origin, while three proteins (serum albumin, haemoglobin α and β subunits) were likely from hosts. Seventeen unigenes corresponding to these proteins were retrieved by searching our previous H. flava salivary glands and midgut transcriptomic datasets. Some proteins were reported to prevent blood clotting, play a role in immunity and antibiosis, and formation of musculature. The functions of the remaining proteins are unknown. Identifying antigens for tick vaccine development is feasible by analyzing the faecal proteome as well as the transcriptomes of salivary glands and midguts. The vast number of proteins detected in tick faeces highlights the complexity of blood digestion in ticks, a field that needs more investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Unspecified 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,462,806
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,885
of 5,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,296
of 439,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#156
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.