↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol of ‘Prism Adaptation in Rehabilitation’: a randomized controlled trial in stroke patients with neglect

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol of ‘Prism Adaptation in Rehabilitation’: a randomized controlled trial in stroke patients with neglect
Published in
BMC Neurology, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0263-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia F Ten Brink, Johanna MA Visser-Meily, Tanja CW Nijboer

Abstract

BackgroundA frequent disorder after stroke is neglect, resulting in a failure to report or respond to contralesional stimuli. Rehabilitation of neglect is important, given the negative influence on motor recovery, independence in self-care, transfers, and locomotion. Effects of prism adaptation (PA) to alleviate neglect have been reported. However, either small groups or no control group were included and few studies reported outcome measurements on the level of activities of daily living (ADL). The current ongoing RCT investigates the short- and long-term effects of PA in a large population in a realistic clinical setting. Measures range from the level of function to the level of ADL.Methods/DesignNeglect patients in the sub-acute phase after stroke are randomly assigned to PA (n¿=¿35) or sham adaptation (SA; n¿=¿35). Adaptation is performed for 10 consecutive weekdays. Patients are tested at start of the study, 1 and 2 weeks after starting, and 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after ending treatment. Primary objectives are changes in performance on neuropsychological tests and neglect in ADL. Secondary objectives are changes in simulated driving, eye movements, balance, visual scanning and mobility, subjective experience of neglect in ADL and independence during ADL.DiscussionIf effective, PA could be implemented as a treatment for neglect.Trial registrationThis trial is registered at the Dutch Trial Register #NTR3278.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 51 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 19%
Psychology 21 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 54 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,988,747
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#666
of 2,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,645
of 352,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.