You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treponema pallidum Immunohistochemistry is positive in human intestinal Spirochetosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13000-017-0676-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rondell P. Graham, Bita V. Naini, Sejal S. Shah, Christina A. Arnold, Rajesh Kannangai, Michael S. Torbenson, Dora M. Lam-Himlin |
| Abstract |
Human intestinal spirochetosis (IS) has been recognized for decades, but whether it represents commensalism or a pathogenic process remains controversial. IS is diagnosed on routine stains with confirmation by silver stains but these stains are labor intensive and slow to read. We evaluated the Treponema pallidum immunostain as a diagnostic adjunct for IS. We retrieved biopsies from 33 patients with IS for this study. Each case was tested by Warthin-Starry (WS) and T. pallidum immunohistochemistry (IHC). Species specific genotyping was performed in 3 cases. Patients with IS ranged from 22 to 82 years without gender predilection. IS involved normal (n = 15), and inflamed (n = 5) mucosa and colonic polyps (n = 13). Warthin-Starry and T. pallidum IHC were positive in all cases including both species of Brachyspira. Six (18%) symptomatic patients were treated for IS, and experienced resolution. In patients diagnosed with incidental IS on cancer screening (n = 5), follow up biopsies, without therapy, were negative for IS. T. pallidum IHC required 75 min less hands-on time than WS for performance and was faster to interpret. T. pallidum IHC can be used to confirm the diagnosis of IS and is easier to perform and faster to interpret than WS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,546,261
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#231
of 1,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,361
of 441,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.