You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cooperative pain education and self-management (COPES): study design and protocol of a randomized non-inferiority trial of an interactive voice response-based self-management intervention for chronic low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-016-0924-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia A. Heapy, Diana M. Higgins, Kathryn M. LaChappelle, Joseph Kirlin, Joseph L. Goulet, Rebecca A. Czlapinski, Eugenia Buta, John D. Piette, Sarah L. Krein, Caroline R. Richardson, Robert D. Kerns |
| Abstract |
The Institute of Medicine report "Relieving Pain in America" recommends the promotion of patient self-management of pain for all people with pain. Given the high prevalence of chronic pain in the US, new strategies are needed to enhance access to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and other evidence-based treatments designed to facilitate self-management of chronic pain conditions. Although CBT is efficacious, many patients have limited or no access to CBT. Technology-assisted delivery of CBT may improve access while maintaining efficacy. We describe a randomized non-inferiority trial of interactive voice response (IVR)-based CBT for patients with chronic low back pain. This intervention uses daily IVR monitoring and weekly pre-recorded therapist feedback, based on patient-reported information, to provide treatment for patients at home. A total of 230 patients with chronic low back pain are being identified from a single statewide health system serving US military veterans. Participants are randomized to receive either ten weeks of in-person CBT or IVR-based CBT. The primary outcome is pain intensity as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale immediately post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include pain-related interference, emotional functioning, and quality of life measured immediately post treatment, and 6 and 9 months post recruitment. Exploratory objectives of the study are to examine: (1) potential mediators of impact on clinical outcomes (treatment retention, self-reported skill practice ratings, IVR call adherence, and treatment satisfaction); and (2) moderators of treatment engagement, adherence to therapist recommendations for pain coping skill practice, and effects on clinical outcomes. This non-inferiority trial may identify an alternative to resource intensive in-person CBT that allows many more patients to receive care while also increasing retention of those enrolled in the program. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01025752 . Registered 3 December 2009. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 285 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 82 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 19% |
| Psychology | 27 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,558,483
of 24,273,038 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#892
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,926
of 302,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,273,038 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.