↓ Skip to main content

Informal carers’ perspectives on the delivery of acute hospital care for patients with dementia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informal carers’ perspectives on the delivery of acute hospital care for patients with dementia: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12877-018-0710-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Beardon, Kiran Patel, Bethan Davies, Helen Ward

Abstract

Providing high quality acute hospital care for patients with dementia is an increasing challenge as the prevalence of the disease rises. Informal carers of people with dementia are a critical resource for improving inpatient care, due to their insights into patients' needs and preferences. We summarise informal carers' perspectives of acute hospital care to inform best practice service delivery. We conducted a systematic search of bibliographic databases and sought relevant grey literature. We used thematic synthesis analysis to assimilate results of the studies and describe components of care that influence perceived quality. Twenty papers met the inclusion criteria. Findings identified four overarching components of care that influenced carer experience and their perceptions of care quality: 'Patient care', 'Staff interactions', 'Carer's situation' and 'Hospital environment'. Need for improvement was identified in staff training, provision of help with personal care needs, and dignified treatment of patients. Carers need to be informed, involved and supported during hospital admission in order to promote the most positive experience. This review identifies common perspectives of informal carers of people with dementia in the acute hospital setting and highlights important areas to address to improve the experience of an admission for both carer and patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Psychology 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,376
of 3,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,996
of 441,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#59
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.