↓ Skip to main content

Effects of exercise on depression in adults with arthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of exercise on depression in adults with arthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0533-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

George A Kelley, Kristi S Kelley, Jennifer M Hootman

Abstract

IntroductionPrevious randomized controlled trials have led to conflicting findings regarding the effects of exercise on depressive symptoms in adults with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions (AORC). The purpose of this study was to use the meta-analytic approach to resolve these discrepancies.MethodsThe inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized controlled trials, (2) exercise (aerobic, strength training, or both) ¿4 weeks, (3) comparative control group, (4) adults with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia or systemic lupus erythematosus, (5) published and unpublished studies in any language since January 1, 1981 and (6) depressive symptoms assessed. Studies were located by searching 10 electronic databases, cross-referencing, hand searching and expert review. Dual-selection of studies and data abstraction was performed. Hedge¿s standardized mean difference effect size (g) was calculated for each result and pooled using random-effects models, an approach that accounts for heterogeneity. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CI) were considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity based on fixed-effect models was estimated using Q and I 2 with alpha values ¿0.10 for Q considered statistically significant.ResultsOf the 500 citations reviewed, 2,449 participants (1,470 exercise, 979 control) nested within 29 studies were included. Length of training, reported as mean¿±¿standard deviation (±SD) was 19¿±¿16 weeks, frequency 4¿±¿2 times per week and duration 34¿±¿17 minutes per session. Overall, statistically significant exercise minus control group reductions were found for depressive symptoms (g¿=¿¿0.42, 95% CI, ¿0.58, ¿0.26, Q¿=¿126.9, P <0.0001, I 2 ¿=¿73.2%). The number needed-to-treat was 7 (95% CI, 6 to 11) with an estimated 3.1 million (95% CI, 2.0 to 3.7) United States adults not currently meeting physical activity guidelines improving their depressive symptoms if they began and maintained a regular exercise program. Using Cohen¿s U3 Index, the percentile reduction was 16.4% (95% CI, 10.4% to 21.9%). All studies were considered to be at high risk of bias with respect to blinding of participants and personnel to group assignment.ConclusionsExercise is associated with reductions in depressive symptoms among selected adults with AORC. A need exists for additional, well-designed and reported studies on this topic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 18%
Student > Master 24 10%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 69 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 14%
Sports and Recreations 24 10%
Psychology 13 6%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 77 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,689,668
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#237
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,077
of 360,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.