Title |
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy for solid tumors: lessons learned and strategies for moving forward
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13045-018-0568-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian Li, Wenwen Li, Kejia Huang, Yang Zhang, Gary Kupfer, Qi Zhao |
Abstract |
Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for the treatment CD19-positive B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. While CAR-T has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of hematopoietic malignancies, whether it can benefit solid tumor patients to the same extent is still uncertain. Even though hundreds of clinical trials are undergoing exploring a variety of tumor-associated antigens (TAA), no such antigen with comparable properties like CD19 has yet been identified regarding solid tumors CAR-T immunotherapy. Inefficient T cell trafficking, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, suboptimal antigen recognition specificity, and lack of safety control are currently considered as the main obstacles in solid tumor CAR-T therapy. Here, we reviewed the solid tumor CAR-T clinical trials, emphasizing the studies with published results. We further discussed the challenges that CAR-T is facing for solid tumor treatment and proposed potential strategies to improve the efficacy of CAR-T as promising immunotherapy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | 33% |
Comoros | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 331 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 50 | 15% |
Researcher | 45 | 14% |
Student > Master | 34 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 9% |
Unknown | 94 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 21% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 46 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
Other | 35 | 11% |
Unknown | 104 | 31% |