↓ Skip to main content

Thyroid function test evolution in children with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is closely conditioned by the biochemical picture at diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thyroid function test evolution in children with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is closely conditioned by the biochemical picture at diagnosis
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13052-018-0461-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Crisafulli, Romina Gallizzi, Tommaso Aversa, Giuseppina Salzano, Mariella Valenzise, Malgorzata Wasniewska, Filippo De Luca, Giuseppina Zirilli

Abstract

ᅟ: Aim of this commentary is to summarize the salient literature views on the relationships between presentation and evolution patterns of thyroid function in children with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). According to the most recent reports, children with HT and subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) are more prone to the risk of developing severe thyroid dysfunctions over time, if compared to those presenting with euthyroidism. In contrast, children presenting with HT and either overt or subclinical hyperthyroidism are incline to exhibit a definitive resolution of the hyperthyroid phase within some months, although there is a wide variability between the different individuals. The natural history of frank hypothyroidism in the children with HT has never been investigated so far, since in these cases an immediate onset of replacement treatment is mandatory. 1) a deterioration of thyroid status over time may be observed especially in the children presenting with SH, but also in those presenting with euthyroidism; 2) a definitive resolution of the hyperthyroid phase is generally observed in those presenting with either overt or subclinical hyperthyroidism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#740
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,285
of 446,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.