↓ Skip to main content

Community-acquired polymicrobial pneumonia in the intensive care unit: aetiology and prognosis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community-acquired polymicrobial pneumonia in the intensive care unit: aetiology and prognosis
Published in
Critical Care, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catia Cillóniz, Santiago Ewig, Miquel Ferrer, Eva Polverino, Albert Gabarrús, Jorge Puig de la Bellacasa, Josep Mensa, Antoni Torres

Abstract

The frequency and clinical significance of polymicrobial aetiology in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients admitted to the ICU have been poorly studied. The aim of the present study was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of severe CAP of polymicrobial aetiology in patients admitted to the ICU.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 52%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,381
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,076
of 137,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#40
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.