↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin as preventive treatment for migraine: a 3-month follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin as preventive treatment for migraine: a 3-month follow-up study
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10194-011-0338-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raffaella Pizzolato, Veronica Villani, Luca Prosperini, Alessandro Ciuffoli, Giuliano Sette

Abstract

Migraine is a common neurological disorder and epidemiological studies have documented its high social and economic impact. Unfortunately, preventive treatment is often insufficient to substantially reduce migraine frequency or it is not well tolerated. Antiepileptic drugs are increasingly used in migraine prevention. However, data on efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin in patients with migraine are still lacking. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin in patients with migraine. We recruited 47 patients who started pregabalin at 75 mg/day, which was titrated to 300 mg/day as tolerated. A total of six patients (13%) reported one or more side effects during the intake of pregabalin; however, three of them discontinued pregabalin, because side effects were intolerable and persistent. Statistically significant reduction in migraine frequency compared to baseline (p < 0.001) was evident after 1 and 3 months of treatment. A greater frequency reduction was observed in those patients who increased the dosage within the first month of therapy. Our data suggest that pregabalin may be well tolerated and may represent an alternative preventive treatment in migraneurs. Limitations of the present study were a small sample size and an uncontrolled, open-label design; further randomized case-control studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 31%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%