↓ Skip to main content

Delays in the post-marketing withdrawal of drugs to which deaths have been attributed: a systematic investigation and analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
104 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delays in the post-marketing withdrawal of drugs to which deaths have been attributed: a systematic investigation and analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0262-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igho J Onakpoya, Carl J Heneghan, Jeffrey K Aronson

Abstract

Post-marketing withdrawal of medicinal products because of deaths can be occasioned by evidence obtained from case reports, observational studies, randomized trials, or systematic reviews. There have been no studies of the pattern of withdrawals of medicinal products to which deaths have been specifically attributed and the evidence that affects such decisions. Our objectives were to identify medicinal products that were withdrawn after marketing in association with deaths, to search for the evidence on which withdrawal decisions were based, and to analyse the delays involved and the worldwide patterns of withdrawal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Other 10 11%
Professor 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#266,761
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#232
of 4,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,115
of 361,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.