You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Delays in the post-marketing withdrawal of drugs to which deaths have been attributed: a systematic investigation and analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0262-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Igho J Onakpoya, Carl J Heneghan, Jeffrey K Aronson |
Abstract |
Post-marketing withdrawal of medicinal products because of deaths can be occasioned by evidence obtained from case reports, observational studies, randomized trials, or systematic reviews. There have been no studies of the pattern of withdrawals of medicinal products to which deaths have been specifically attributed and the evidence that affects such decisions. Our objectives were to identify medicinal products that were withdrawn after marketing in association with deaths, to search for the evidence on which withdrawal decisions were based, and to analyse the delays involved and the worldwide patterns of withdrawal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 23 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 10% |
United States | 7 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 77 | 74% |
Scientists | 15 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 21% |
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#266,761
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#232
of 4,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,115
of 361,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.