You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-6-88 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew R Davies, Matthew J Forshaw, Aadil A Khan, Alia S Noorani, Vanash M Patel, Dirk C Strauss, Robert C Mason |
| Abstract |
The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramatically. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 72% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,680,234
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#244
of 2,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,581
of 84,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.