You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Debate: Limitations on universality: the "right to health" and the necessity of legal nationality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-10-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsey N Kingston, Elizabeth F Cohen, Christopher P Morley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 23% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,381
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,967
of 105,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.