↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of governance approaches for the control of antimicrobial resistance: Analysis of three European countries

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of governance approaches for the control of antimicrobial resistance: Analysis of three European countries
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13756-018-0321-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Birgand, Enrique Castro-Sánchez, Sonja Hansen, Petra Gastmeier, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Ewan Ferlie, Alison Holmes, Raheelah Ahmad

Abstract

Policy makers and governments are calling for coordination to address the crisis emerging from the ineffectiveness of current antibiotics and stagnated pipe-line of new ones - antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Wider contextual drivers and mechanisms are contributing to shifts in governance strategies in health care, but are national health system approaches aligned with strategies required to tackle antimicrobial resistance? This article provides an analysis of governance approaches within healthcare systems including: priority setting, performance monitoring and accountability for AMR prevention in three European countries: England, France and Germany. Advantages and unresolved issues from these different experiences are reported, concluding that mechanisms are needed to support partnerships between healthcare professionals and patients with democratized decision-making and accountability via collaboration. But along with this multi-stakeholder approach to governance, a balance between regulation and persuasion is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Other 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 52 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 64 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,653,504
of 24,384,616 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#175
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,507
of 334,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.