↓ Skip to main content

Walker-Warburg syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Walker-Warburg syndrome
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-1-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiri Vajsar, Harry Schachter

Abstract

Walker-Warburg Syndrome (WWS) is a rare form of autosomal recessive congenital muscular dystrophy associated with brain and eye abnormalities. WWS has a worldwide distribution. The overall incidence is unknown but a survey in North-eastern Italy has reported an incidence rate of 1.2 per 100,000 live births. It is the most severe form of congenital muscular dystrophy with most children dying before the age of three years. WWS presents at birth with generalized hypotonia, muscle weakness, developmental delay with mental retardation and occasional seizures. It is associated with type II cobblestone lissencephaly, hydrocephalus, cerebellar malformations, eye abnormalities and congenital muscular dystrophy characterized by hypoglycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan. Several genes have been implicated in the etiology of WWS, and others are as yet unknown. Several mutations were found in the Protein O-Mannosyltransferase 1 and 2 (POMT1 and POMT2) genes, and one mutation was found in each of the fukutin and fukutin-related protein (FKRP) genes. Laboratory investigations usually show elevated creatine kinase, myopathic/dystrophic muscle pathology and altered alpha-dystroglycan. Antenatal diagnosis is possible in families with known mutations. Prenatal ultrasound may be helpful for diagnosis in families where the molecular defect is unknown. No specific treatment is available. Management is only supportive and preventive.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Other 14 11%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,083
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,744
of 65,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.