You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected diets in the UK and their association with diet quality: is energy under-reporting a problem?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-018-0338-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kentaro Murakami, M. Barbara E. Livingstone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 64% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,076,546
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#306
of 1,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,021
of 344,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.