↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: DNA methylome profiling at single-base resolution through bisulfite sequencing of 5mC-immunoprecipitated DNA

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: DNA methylome profiling at single-base resolution through bisulfite sequencing of 5mC-immunoprecipitated DNA
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12896-017-0409-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhen Jia, Yueyi Shi, Lei Zhang, Yipeng Ren, Tong Wang, Lejun Xing, Baorong Zhang, Guolan Gao, Rongfa Bu

Abstract

Detection of DNA methylome at single-base resolution is a significant challenge but promises to shed considerable light on human disease etiology. Current technologies could not detect DNA methylation genome-wide at single-base resolution with small amount of sequencing data and could not avoid detecting the methylation of repetitive elements which are considered as "junk DNA". In this study, we have developed a novel DNA methylome profiling technology named MB-seq with its ability to identify genome-wide 5mC and quantify DNA methylation levels by introduced an assistant adapter AluI-linker This linker can be ligated to sonicated DNA and then be digested after the bisulfite treatment and amplification, which has no effect of MeDIP enrichment. Because many researchers are interested in investigating the methylation of functional regions such as promoters and gene bodies, we have also developed a novel alternative method named MRB-seq, which can be used to investigate the DNA methylation of functional regions by removing the repeats with Cot-1 DNA. In this study, we have developed MB-seq, a novel DNA methylome profiling technology combining MeDIP-seq with bisulfite conversion, which can precisely detect the 5mC sites and determine their DNA methylation level at single-base resolution in a cost-effective way. In addition, we have developed a new alternative method, MRB-seq (MeDIP-repetitive elements removal-bisulfite sequencing), which interrogates 5mCs in functional regions by depleting nearly half of repeat fragments enriched by MeDIP. Comparing MB-seq and MRB-seq to whole-genome BS-seq using the same batch of DNA from YH peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We found that the sequencing data of MB-seq and MRB-seq almost reaches saturation after generating 7-8 Gbp data, whereas BS-seq requires about 100 Gbp data to achieve the same effect. In comparison to MeDIP-seq and BS-seq, MB-seq offers several key advantages, including single-base resolution, discriminating the methylated sites within a CpG and non-CpG pattern and overcoming the false positive of MeDIP-seq due to the non-specific binding of 5-methylcytidine antibody to genomic fragments. Our novel developed method MB-seq can accelerate the decoding process of DNA methylation mechanism in human diseases because it requires 7-8 Gbp data to measure human methylome with enough coverage and sequencing depth, affording it a direct and practical application in the study of multiple samples. In addition, we have also provided a novel alternative MRB-seq method, which removes most repetitive sequences and allows researchers to genome-wide characterize DNA methylation of functional regions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Engineering 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%