You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antioxidant and hepatic protective effects of lotus root hot water extract with taurine supplementation in rats fed a high fat diet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1423-0127-17-s1-s39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huan Du, Xu Zhao, Jeong-Soon You, Ji-Yeon Park, Sung-Hoon Kim, Kyung-Ja Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 295 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 44 | 15% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 295 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#218,851
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#13
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#529
of 108,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.