↓ Skip to main content

High prevalence of Trichinella pseudospiralis in Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi)

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High prevalence of Trichinella pseudospiralis in Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi)
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0674-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mason V Reichard, Marc Criffield, Jennifer E Thomas, Jacqueline M Paritte, Mark Cunningham, Dave Onorato, Kenneth Logan, Maria Interisano, Gianluca Marucci, Edoardo Pozio

Abstract

BackgroundParasites of the genus Trichinella are zoonotic nematodes common in carnivores throughout the world. We determined the prevalence and species of Trichinella infections in Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi).MethodsTongues from Florida panthers were collected at necropsy and examined by pepsin-HCl artificial digestion for infection with Trichinella spp. DNA was extracted from larvae and multiplex PCR using Trichinella species-specific primers was used to genotype the worms.Results Trichinella spp. larvae were detected in 24 of 112 (21.4%; 14.6%¿30.3%) panthers. Sixteen of the panthers (14.3%) were infected with T. pseudospiralis, 1 (0.9%) was infected with T. spiralis, and 2 (1.8%) had mixed infections of T. pseudospiralis and T. spiralis. Trichinella spp. larvae from 5 panthers were not identified at the species level due to degraded DNA.ConclusionsThis is the highest prevalence of T. pseudospiralis detected in North America up to now and suggests the Florida panther is a key mammalian reservoir of this parasite in southern Florida. Trichinella pseudospiralis can infect both mammals and birds indicting the source of infection for Florida panthers could be broader than believed; however, birds represent a small percentage (0.01%) of the cat¿s diet. Since wild pigs (Sus scrofa) can be parasitized by both T. pseudospiralis and T. spiralis and that these swine can comprise a large portion (~40%) of a panther¿s diet in Florida, we believe that Florida panthers acquired these zoonotic parasites from feeding on wild pigs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,269
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,017
of 360,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#92
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.