You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-throughput phenotyping of plant resistance to aphids by automated video tracking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-015-0044-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen J Kloth, Cindy JM ten Broeke, Manus PM Thoen, Marianne Hanhart-van den Brink, Gerrie L Wiegers, Olga E Krips, Lucas PJJ Noldus, Marcel Dicke, Maarten A Jongsma |
| Abstract |
Piercing-sucking insects are major vectors of plant viruses causing significant yield losses in crops. Functional genomics of plant resistance to these insects would greatly benefit from the availability of high-throughput, quantitative phenotyping methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Russia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#465
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,668
of 361,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.