↓ Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of the BG-Sentinel trap, CDC light trap and Mosquito-oviposition trap for the surveillance of vector mosquitoes

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of the BG-Sentinel trap, CDC light trap and Mosquito-oviposition trap for the surveillance of vector mosquitoes
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1724-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiji Li, Xinghua Su, Guofa Zhou, Hong Zhang, Santhosh Puthiyakunnon, Shufen Shuai, Songwu Cai, Jinbao Gu, Xiaohong Zhou, Guiyun Yan, Xiao-Guang Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 196 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 14 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 62 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Environmental Science 16 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#958,802
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#118
of 5,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,681
of 364,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#2
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.