↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-7-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flora Zagouri, Athanasios-Meletios Dimopoulos, Stelios Fotiou, Vassilios Kouloulias, Christos A Papadimitriou

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas are a rare group of neoplasms with aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. They are classified into four main histological subtypes in order of decreasing incidence: carcinosarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, endometrial stromal sarcomas and "other" sarcomas. The pathological subtype demands a tailored approach. Surgical resection is regarded as the mainstay of treatment. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy represents the standard treatment of uterine sarcomas. Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection in carcinosarcomas is recommended, given their high incidence of lymph node metastases, and may have a role in endometrial stromal sarcomas. Adjuvant radiation therapy has historically been of little survival value, but it appears to improve local control and may delay recurrence. Regarding adjuvant chemotherapy, there is little evidence in the literature supporting its use except for carcinosarcomas. However, more trials are needed to address these issues, especially, their sequential application. Patients with uterine sarcomas should be referred to large academic centers for participation in clinical trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#238
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,974
of 93,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.