↓ Skip to main content

Application of magnetic techniques in the field of drug discovery and biomedicine

Overview of attention for article published in BioMagnetic Research and Technology, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of magnetic techniques in the field of drug discovery and biomedicine
Published in
BioMagnetic Research and Technology, September 2003
DOI 10.1186/1477-044x-1-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

ZM Saiyed, SD Telang, CN Ramchand

Abstract

Magnetic separation technology, using magnetic particles, is quick and easy method for sensitive and reliable capture of specific proteins, genetic material and other biomolecules. The technique offers an advantage in terms of subjecting the analyte to very little mechanical stress compared to other methods. Secondly, these methods are non-laborious, cheap and often highly scalable. Moreover, techniques employing magnetism are more amenable to automation and miniaturization. Now that the human genome is sequenced and about 30,000 genes are annotated, the next step is to identify the function of these individual genes, carrying out genotyping studies for allelic variation and SNP analysis, ultimately leading to identification of novel drug targets. In this post-genomic era, technologies based on magnetic separation are becoming an integral part of todays biology laboratory. This article briefly reviews the selected applications of magnetic separation techniques in the field of biotechnology, biomedicine and drug discovery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 18%
United Kingdom 2 12%
India 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
France 1 6%
Spain 1 6%
Sri Lanka 1 6%
Japan 1 6%
Serbia 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 224%
Researcher 24 141%
Student > Master 20 118%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 82%
Student > Bachelor 10 59%
Other 28 165%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 188%
Chemistry 27 159%
Physics and Astronomy 16 94%
Engineering 12 71%
Materials Science 11 65%
Other 32 188%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,872,991
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from BioMagnetic Research and Technology
#2
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,898
of 56,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMagnetic Research and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them