↓ Skip to main content

Layer-specific systolic and diastolic strain in hypertensive patients with and without mild diastolic dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Layer-specific systolic and diastolic strain in hypertensive patients with and without mild diastolic dysfunction
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, March 2018
DOI 10.1530/erp-17-0072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hisham Sharif, Stephen Ting, Lynsey Forsythe, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Deborah O’Leary, David Ditor, Keith George, Daniel Zehnder, David Oxborough

Abstract

This study sought to examine layer-specific longitudinal and circumferential systolic and diastolic strain, strain rate (SR) and diastolic time intervals in hypertensive patients with and without diastolic dysfunction. Fifty-eight treated hypertensive patients were assigned to normal diastolic function (NDF, N=39) or mild diastolic dysfunction (DD, N=19) group. Layer-specific systolic and diastolic longitudinal and circumferential strains and SR were assessed. Results showed no between group difference in left ventricular mass index (DD: 92.1±18.1 vs NDF: 88.4±16.3; p=0.44). Patients with DD had a proportional reduction in longitudinal strain across the myocardium (endocardial for DD -13±4%; vs NDF -17±3, p<0.01; epicardial for DD -10±3% vs NDF -13±3%, p<0.01; global for DD: -12±3% vs NDF: -15±3, p=0.01), and longitudinal mechanical diastolic impairments as evidenced by reduced longitudinal strain rate of early diastole (DD 0.7±0.2 l/s vs NDF 1.0±0.3 l/s, p<0.01) and absence of a transmural gradient in the duration of diastolic strain (DD endocardial: 547±105ms vs epicardial: 542±113ms, p=0.24; NDF endocardial: 566±86ms vs epicardial: 553±77ms, p=0.03). Patients with DD also demonstrate a longer duration of early circumferential diastolic strain (231±71ms vs 189±58ms, p=0.02). In conclusion, hhypertensive patients with mild DD demonstrate a proportional reduction in longitudinal strain across the myocardium, as well as longitudinal mechanical diastolic impairment, and prolonging duration of circumferential mechanical relaxation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Engineering 4 17%
Psychology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,672,981
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#92
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,543
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.