↓ Skip to main content

Response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST/RECIST) and SUVmax in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST/RECIST) and SUVmax in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy
Published in
Radiation Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13014-018-0980-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory Pierson, Taras Grinchak, Casey Sokolovic, Brandi Holland, Teresa Parent, Mark Bowling, Hyder Arastu, Paul Walker, Andrew Ju

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and of pre- and post-treatment maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) in regards to survival and tumor control for patients treated for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This is a retrospective review of patients with ES-NSCLC treated at our institution using SBRT. Lobar, locoregional, and distant failures were evaluated based on PERCIST/RECIST and clinical course. Univariate analysis of the Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), lobar control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC) was conducted using the log-rank test. Pre- and post-treatment SUVmaxwere evaluated using cutoffs of < 5 and ≥ 5, < 4 and ≥ 4, and < 3 and ≥ 3. ∆SUVmaxwas also evaluated at various cutoffs. Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate survival outcomes based on age, gender, pre-treatment gross tumor volume (GTV), longest tumor dimension on imaging, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). This study included 95 patients (53 female, 42 male), median age 75. Lung SBRT was delivered in 3-5 fractions to a total of 48-60 Gy, with a BEDα/β = 10Gyof at least 100 Gy. Median OS and PFS from the end of SBRT was 15.4 and 11.9 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, PERCIST/RECIST response correlated with PFS (p = 0.039), LC (p = 0.007), and LRC (p = 0.015) but not OS (p = 0.21) or DC (p = 0.94). Pre-treatment SUVmaxand post-treatment SUVmaxwith cutoff values of < 5 and ≥ 5, < 4 and ≥ 4, and < 3 and ≥ 3 did not predict for OS, PFS, LC, LRC, or DC. ∆SUVmaxdid not predict for OS, PFS, LC, LRC, or DC. On multivariate analysis, pre-treatment GTV ≥ 30 cm3was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes when accounting for other confounding variables. PERCIST/RECIST response is associated with improved LC and PFS in patients treated for ES-NSCLC with SBRT. In contrast, pre- and post-treatment SUVmaxis not predictive of disease control or survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,482
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,290
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,068
of 330,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#24
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.